[Tsung] Re: Precision on tsung-fullstats.log
philippe vanderstraeten
phvander at gmail.com
Thu Apr 24 13:24:52 CEST 2008
Nicolas,
thanks for your anwser.
I am surprised about those 895 microseconds because the test was running at
home on my ADSL line. So it is too short as a response time. Actually I have
a ping of about 50/70 milliseconds onto the host
So I mail you my two files on a separate mail.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Nicolas Niclausse <nicolas at niclux.org>
wrote:
> philippe vanderstraeten ecrivait le 23.04.2008 14:57:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just want to add something else about those values:
> >
>
> {sample,tr_trx_init,616.895}
> mean: 616 milliseconds and 895 microseconds.
>
> For the same run, if 616 is expressed in milliseconds, the report give me
> > a lowest mean value transaction time of 0.000443 sec. So there is wrong
> > somewhere because this 0.000443 sec value is wrong.
> >
>
> It's weird. In the latest version on the trunk, the perl script and
> templates have changed and it should not print something like 0.000443 sec.
>
> Can you send me the tsung.log file and fullstats log ?
> --
> Nicolas
> _______________________________________________
> Tsung-users mailing list
> Tsung-users at lists.process-one.net
> https://lists.process-one.net/mailman/listinfo/tsung-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.process-one.net/pipermail/tsung-users/attachments/20080424/a4d0981d/attachment.html
More information about the Tsung-users
mailing list